Irlen.wikiAn independent record of the Irlen Institute, the Irlen Method and the evidence about them

Sources

From Irlen.wiki, an independent record of the Irlen Institute, its colored overlays and filters, and what researchers say

In brief: Every fact on Irlen.wiki should trace to one of the sources below, grouped by type, with the date each was accessed.

A note on independence: Irlen.wiki is an independent record compiled from irlen.com, irlensyndrome.org, public records and published research. It is not operated by the Irlen Institute, sells nothing and gives no medical or educational advice. The Institute’s statements are attributed to it and shown beside independent assessments. Sourcing rules: editorial policy.

Which Irlen Institute pages were used?

Pages on irlen.com: home, about, founder, contact, method, testing, overlays, filters, FAQs, self-tests, testing centers, qualifications, science, research, bibliography and claims pages. Statements from these pages are attributed to the Institute.

Which foundation pages were used?

Pages on irlensyndrome.org: history, board, financials, awareness week and blog posts.

Which listings were used?

The Google Business Profile for the Long Beach headquarters, for category, hours and rating.

Which public records were used?

The U.S. patent record for US 4,961,640.

Which scientific and professional sources were used?

Professional statements from pediatric and ophthalmology bodies, PubMed-indexed studies and reviews, EyeWiki and a physician-written review.

Which press sources were used?

An ABC News (Australia) report from 2019.

Which general references were used?

Encyclopedia articles for definitions and background.

Which social profiles were used?

The accounts linked from the Institute’s website.

Which sources were checked but not used?

  • Client testimonials and success stories, which are selected by the Institute and cannot be checked.
  • LinkedIn and X accounts not linked from the Institute’s website.
  • Clinic listings for individual practitioners.
  • Figures from the Institute’s research summaries that could not be traced to a checkable study.

Common questions

Why is Wikipedia cited?

Only for background and the recognition status of the condition, which is also supported by professional sources.

Where do the professional statements come from?

From PubMed records of the joint statements, RANZCO’s own pages and EyeWiki.

Are the Institute’s claims checked?

They are attributed to the Institute; where an independent study or statement exists, it is cited alongside.